Chemtrail Crack-Pot Conspiracies

Hello once again, I know after weeks of complete inactivity, you’re now getting two posts in one day! Aren’t you lucky, eh? I write this post mostly as a response to a small group of people with whom I’ve been having a debate on the subject of “chemtrails”, but also as a general response to the, frankly crazy, conspiracy as a whole. Now, hopefully, this won’t be quite as long as this morning’s article, but it should outline the main reasons why the very notion of the chemtrail is a ludicrous one without any real basis. So, here we go:

How the Jet Engine Works:

A jet engine is a surprisingly simple piece of kit that relies on Newton’s Third Law of Motion to propel an aircraft forward, the famous ” To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts.” (from Newton’s Principia).

Essentially what happens is that a vast volume of cold air is sucked into the jet engine and compressed by an array of fans until it heats up to a temperature hot enough to sustain the combustion of the jet fuel. This superheated air is passed into the “hot section” of the engine, where it is mixed with the jet fuel and ignited by an electric spark (much the same as the spark plug in your car’s internal combustion engine). The burning fuel and hot air are thrust backwards out of the turbine, and this is where Newton’s Third Law of Motion comes into effect; the force of the fuel and air being thrust backwards generates a force equal in magnitude in the opposite direction which is responsible for driving the aircraft forwards.

So then, what’s coming out the back of this engine? Well, a couple of things, firstly the Carbon Dioxide and other by-products of hydrocarbon fuel burning. One of these by-products is something quite harmless and very simple, and this is the one that we see; it is, of course, water. Nothing more sinister than that makes up the trail.

When the water, now exceedingly hot, is ejected from the rear of the turbine it cools and condenses, forming tiny ice crystals resulting in the white haze we see. This is very close, in fact, to the process by which clouds are formed, simple condensation; which is where we get the correct name for this phenomenon the “contrail” or “vapour trail”. These trails should only appear at altitudes of roughly 26’000 feet or above, where the temperature is below about -40°C, or in regions where it is very cold at altitudes below 26’000 feet. This is consistent with observations.

So Why Can’t There Be Harmful Chemicals in There Too?:

Well, apart from the fuel by-products which, of course, contribute to climate change, there are a couple of reasons, some physical/chemical, others political and some quite simply logistical.

Let’s look at a picture of a contrail… in fact, in order to remain reasonable neutral for now, let’s call them cirrus aviaticus. So, yeah, let’s look a a quick snap of a plan and cirrus aviaticus being projected behind it.

Boeing 747-400 seen emitting Cirrus Aviaticus

So, let’s examine this picture a little, shall we? The first thing we notice is that the trails appear to start several dozens of feet from the exhaust port of the engine, and this is for a very simple physical reason; a heated substance requires time to cool. What you are seeing here is the time it takes the superheated moisture being ejected from the engine to cool and condense to form the clouds behind the jet. Chemicals being sprayed downwards would not necessarily require this time; look for example at the Red Arrows (the world-famous RAF display team) who eject a coloured smoke out of the rear of their planes during displays. This smoke, much like any other gaseous or smoke based chemical, appears right at the port from where it is being ejected, unlike the Cirrus Aviaticus.

But suppose the chemicals are coming from the engine itself, they would then require time to cool, and may in that case, much like the water, require time to become visible. This is a valid point, however it does require messing with the chemistry of the aviation fuel in order to inject the chemicals (what ever they may be) into the fuel to be ejected. This would have a number of effects, not least of all messing with the combustibility of the fuel used, something that is very precisely calculated for modern aircraft. It would also require fiddling with the already very high precision piece of equipment that is the modern jet engine. Adding more pipes and lines into a jet engine is more easily said than done.

But supposing that the chemicals can appear in much the same way as the water and behave in the same physical and chemical manners, and suppose that the chemicals can easily be injected into the fuel stream and into the engine without affecting the performance of the plane. We now have the question of “where does it go?” We’ll we’ve already established that any chemicals being mixed with the fuel is a bad idea, so where would one put a tank of chemicals?

The simple fact here is that there isn’t room. A modern jet is built so that there is very little spare room left. Empty fuselage space is wasted space which is added weight for no reason, which wastes fuel and in turn wastes money. The simple answer here is that there is no space for any extra chemical tanks on a plane.

And my final point is this; why? Quite simply why would airline companies or governments bother to poison us from the air? Forget for a second why they would bother in the first place, but why from altitudes of more than 25’000 feet? The fact is that such a practice would be hideously inaccurate, inefficient and expensive; think about crop dusting, it’s only ever really done from heights of less that about 100 feet. Above heights of about 100 feet winds begin to carry chemicals far off of their intended course, which of course, means more of the chemical is required, which costs much more too.

Not only that but it would require world governments who are generally opposed to one and other to agree to mass poisoning of their peoples. There are much easier, cheaper and diplomatic solutions to mass poisoning, such as water supply contamination, crop contamination, etc.

Now I’m not saying that aviation is as clean as a whistle, there are still harsh chemicals associated with the exhaust fumes that contribute to climate change and there is still a lot that needs to be done. However, the idea that Cirrus Aviaticus is down to “Chemtrails” is quite simply a ludicrous conspiracy theory designed to scare the common layman who knows no better, and that is something I cannot stand.

As usual, feel free to chime in via comments etc, and I do apologise for the length of this article, I tried to keep it as short as I could. Thanks for reading.


Get Involved in the Debate!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s